T4T Macro IFVG — Execution Log
| Account | Executor | Market | Open | Today | Balance | P&L since 18:00 NY | Last signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nas2m gc2m ym5m es5m nq3m Vantage demo | LIVE beat 3m ago (every 5m) | OPEN next macro 03:50–04:10 NY (nas2m) in 2h 15m | nas2m: long 12.7 NAS100 · nq3m: long 8.6 NAS100 | 2 signals · 2 traded caps per setup below | 99,690.33 | -206.89 +288.60 banked + costs · -495.49 still open | 1h ago |
2 positions open right now
Entry and stop are the broker's own figures; the current price is what it quoted at the last heartbeat. ⭐ This section appears only while something is open.
⚠ Up to 5 minutes old — it rides the heartbeat rather than costing a write of its own, so the price has moved since. The stop shown is the one the broker holds, and that is what will actually execute.
Every alert at a glance
One row per live alert. ⚠ Each row is its own configuration: results are never added across rows, and R is the figure to compare — risk per trade differs between setups, so dollars do not.
| Setup | Schedule | Open | Today | Closed | Net R | Net $ | Last signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| es5m VANTAGE:SP500 · 5m last: scratched at breakeven after TP1 · +140.60 · +0.29R · 1d ago | next 03:50 in 2h 15m alert 57d left | flat | 0/5 | 1 · 1W 0L | +0.29R avg +0.29R | +141 | 1d ago |
| gc2m VANTAGE:XAUUSD · 2m last: closed at end of day after TP2 · +667.80 · +1.38R · 9h ago | next 08:50 in 7h 15m alert 57d left | flat | 0/5 | 4 · 2W 2L | +1.15R avg +0.29R | +565 | 9h ago |
| nas2m VANTAGE:NAS100 · 2m last: scratched at breakeven after TP2 · +447.65 · +0.92R · 16h ago | next 03:50 in 2h 15m alert 57d left | long 12.7 NAS100 | 1/4 | 8 · 2W 6L | -3.49R avg -0.44R | -1,714 | 1h ago |
| nq3m VANTAGE:NAS100 · 3m last: final target hit · +971.04 · +2.01R · 15h ago | next 03:50 in 2h 15m alert 57d left | long 8.6 NAS100 | 1/4 | 3 · 2W 1L | +2.09R avg +0.70R | +1,002 | 1h ago |
| ym5m VANTAGE:DJ30 · 5m last: scratched at breakeven after TP2 · +401.80 · +0.85R · 13h ago | next 03:50 in 2h 15m alert 57d left | flat | 0/4 | 1 · 1W 0L | +0.85R avg +0.85R | +402 | 13h ago |
Earlier settings, and what they produced
⭐ Kept because the trades are evidence about that configuration. ⚠ They are not pooled with the live figures — comparing two different strategies as one sample would say nothing true about either. Gold 2-minute (FTMO demo) · Gold 2-minute · Nasdaq 3-minute
Notes on the strategy, from running it →
⭐ What running this on live accounts has made visible that a backtest cannot show — the division of labour between the strategy and the executor, what we measured, the gaps, and the design questions that belong to the author rather than to us. ⛔ Including the four changes we expected to help, measured, and dropped.
KV writes today — 881 of 1,000
The relay runs on a free tier capped at 1,000 writes a day, and ⛔ nothing would announce running out — writes would simply start failing while the relay kept answering and this page kept rendering the last good record. ⭐ So the figure is derived rather than counted: a counter would itself cost a write every time it moved.
| Source | Writes/day | Scales with |
|---|---|---|
| Heartbeats | 864 | ⚠ executors, not instruments — another instrument on an existing account costs nothing here |
| Trade reports | 17 | trades × ~5 legs each |
| Events | 0 | plans, and ⚠ a refusal costs two |
| Projected total | 881 (88%) | at today's rate, 23% of the day elapsed |
⭐ One more executor would add 288 writes a day before it placed a single trade — that, not more trading, is what would breach this. The durable record already lives in a database; this budget only governs the relay's own working store.
Deadlines and gaps
- nothing outstanding