| Account | Executor | Market | Open | Today | Balance | P&L today | Last signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nas2m gc2m ym5m es5m nq3m Vantage demo | LIVE beat 2m ago (every 5m) | OPEN 12:50–13:10 NY (ym5m) closed · 4m signal tail · next 18:50–19:10 NY in 5h 14m | gc2m: long 0.83 XAUUSD · nq3m: short 10.3 NAS100 | 5 signals · 3 traded caps per setup below | 97,032.20 | +147.10 2 positions open · includes their floating P&L | 18m ago |
Entry and stop are the broker's own figures; the current price is what it quoted at the last heartbeat. ⭐ This section appears only while something is open.
⚠ Up to 5 minutes old — it rides the heartbeat rather than costing a write of its own, so the price has moved since. The stop shown is the one the broker holds, and that is what will actually execute.
filled 30,587.00 · stop 30,667.41 · targets 30,573.83 / 30,527.04 / 30,480.25
The executor reports one position per heartbeat, and it reported gc2m's. Full detail on its own page.
One row per live alert. ⚠ Each row is its own configuration: results are never added across rows, and R is the figure to compare — risk per trade differs between setups, so dollars do not.
| Setup | Schedule | Open | Today | Closed | Net R | Net $ | Last signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| es5m VANTAGE:SP500 · 5m last: scratched at breakeven after TP1 · +140.60 · +0.29R · 3h ago | next 14:50 in 1h 14m alert 59d left | flat | 2/5 1 traded | 1 · 1W 0L | +0.29R avg +0.29R | +141 | 3h ago |
| gc2m VANTAGE:XAUUSD · 2m no closed trade yet | next 19:50 in 6h 14m alert 59d left | long 0.83 XAUUSD | 2/5 1 traded | 0 | — | — | 20m ago |
| nas2m VANTAGE:NAS100 · 2m last: stop hit · -622.01 · -1.28R · 1d ago | next 23:50 in 10h 14m alert 59d left | flat | 0/4 | 7 · 1W 6L | -4.42R avg -0.63R | -2,161 | 1d ago |
| nq3m VANTAGE:NAS100 · 3m no closed trade yet | next 23:50 in 10h 14m alert 59d left | short 10.3 NAS100 | 1/4 | 0 | — | — | 18m ago |
| ym5m VANTAGE:DJ30 · 5m no closed trade yet | 12:50 closed · 4m tail alert 59d left | flat | 0/4 | 0 | — | — | never |
⭐ Kept because the trades are evidence about that configuration. ⚠ They are not pooled with the live figures — comparing two different strategies as one sample would say nothing true about either. Gold 2-minute (FTMO demo) · Gold 2-minute · Nasdaq 3-minute
⭐ What running this on live accounts has made visible that a backtest cannot show — the division of labour between the strategy and the executor, what we measured, the gaps, and the design questions that belong to the author rather than to us. ⛔ Including the four changes we expected to help, measured, and dropped.
The relay runs on a free tier capped at 1,000 writes a day, and ⛔ nothing would announce running out — writes would simply start failing while the relay kept answering and this page kept rendering the last good record. ⭐ So the figure is derived rather than counted: a counter would itself cost a write every time it moved.
| Source | Writes/day | Scales with |
|---|---|---|
| Heartbeats | 864 | ⚠ executors, not instruments — another instrument on an existing account costs nothing here |
| Trade reports | 11 | trades × ~5 legs each |
| Events | 0 | plans, and ⚠ a refusal costs two |
| Projected total | 875 (88%) | at today's rate, 73% of the day elapsed |
⭐ One more executor would add 288 writes a day before it placed a single trade — that, not more trading, is what would breach this. The durable record already lives in a database; this budget only governs the relay's own working store.